The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have announced their plans to return to the United Kingdom this month, sparking renewed discussions about their security arrangements. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle intend to settle in a private residence outside London, where their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, will begin school in September.

The couple’s decision to relocate has prompted questions about whether they will receive publicly funded security. Since stepping back as senior royals in 2020 and moving to the United States, the Sussexes have privately funded their own protection. However, their permanent return to the UK necessitates a reassessment by the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec), an independent body under the Home Office’s oversight.

Previously, Ravec determined that Prince Harry’s security needs would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis due to his infrequent visits to the UK. Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who does not influence royal security decisions, described the matter as private, extending well wishes to the couple on their move. The Home Office has maintained that while the UK’s protective security system is rigorous, details cannot be disclosed to avoid compromising safety.

Security has been a longstanding issue for the Sussexes. Last year, Prince Harry lost a legal challenge over the level of protection he and his family receive during UK visits. Since their departure from royal duties, they have relied on private security in California. When asked whether their current security team would accompany them to the UK, the couple did not respond.

The outcome of Ravec’s reassessment could determine whether the couple qualifies for taxpayer-funded security. However, as they will not resume full-time royal duties, they may not receive the same level of protection as before. Other non-working royals receive only limited security, which could lead to further tensions if applied to Prince Harry.

Their high public profile, Prince Harry’s military service in Afghanistan, and his close ties to the monarchy remain key considerations. If taxpayer-funded security is not granted, the couple may need to supplement any provided protection at their own expense. In a previous interview, Prince Harry expressed concerns about bringing his family to the UK without adequate security, stating he “can’t see a world” where it would be feasible.

A source close to the couple explained that the timing of their move was ideal for their family, describing them as an international couple who enjoy travel. Their decision follows a July visit to King Charles at his Highgrove home, marking the first time the monarch had seen his grandchildren in person in over four years. The King, who was informed of their plans on Sunday, is reportedly looking forward to spending more time with them.

The move also aligns with significant upcoming events, including the 2025 Invictus Games in Birmingham, which would have required extensive travel for Prince Harry. Additionally, next year marks the 30th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death, with commemorations expected in the UK. The couple’s return will allow them to be closer to Diana’s family, following a summer stay at the Spencer family estate in Althorp.

While the Sussexes will maintain their California home, Meghan’s media work and her online food business, As Ever, can be managed from the UK. Royal author Valentine Low suggested that a key motivation for their return is Prince Harry’s desire to rebuild family ties, particularly with his father.

For ongoing coverage of royal developments, readers can subscribe to the Royal Watch newsletter, available weekly for those in the UK and internationally.